Here’s a full list of the Green New Deal documents in Biden’s $ 3.5 trillion plan to rebuild better.
Democrats have included numerous provisions and subsidy programs in their $ 3.5 trillion budget that would benefit green energy companies and accelerate the transition to renewable energy.
The Build Back Better Act would invest roughly $ 295 billion of taxpayer dollars in a variety of clean energy programs in what would amount to the most sweeping climate effort passed by Congress, according to to a report of the House Committee on Energy and Trade. This price does not take into account other expensive measures approved by the House Ways and Means, Agriculture, Natural Resources, Surveillance and Transportation committees last month.
“This bill is full of green social grants, especially for businesses and the wealthy,” House Ways and Means ranking member Kevin Brady told the Daily Caller News Foundation in an interview.
“They’re expanding and creating a whole host of green energy tax credits such as power transmission properties, zero-emission facilities, and clean hydrogen,” the Texas Republican continued. “It’s not just tax credits anymore, on top of the taxes you owe. These are direct remunerations. In fact, they are checks from the Washington government.
The credits Brady referred to would be incite the development of new national renewable energy transmission lines, reward facilities that produce zero or net negative carbon emissions and gap the major costs associated with the production of clean hydrogen electricity. But these subsidies represent a small part of the gifts wrapped in the legislation.
Overall, the bill includes major aspects of the New Green Deal, the giant climate legislation first proposal by progressive lawmakers in 2019. The Green New Deal is estimated to cost nearly $ 93 trillion and would cost American families up to $ 65,300 a year.
The Democrats’ budget would include a credit of up to $ 12,500 for consumers who buy a new electric vehicle, $ 2,500 for the purchase of electric motorcycles and even $ 1,500 for electric bikes, according to Myron Ebell, director of the. Center for Energy and Environment at the Competitive. Institute of the Enterprise. About $ 13.5 billion would be invested in building new electric vehicle infrastructure nationwide.
President Joe Biden recently set an objective 50% of all vehicles purchased in 2030 will be electric. In addition, its administration noted the United States would reduce its emissions by 50% by 2030, have 100% carbon-free electricity by 2035 and achieve net zero emissions by 2050.
“This is all ridiculous,” Ebell told DCNF. “It would be laughable, except that it is not laughable because it will have extremely negative economic consequences. We cannot achieve any of these goals, but by trying to do so, we can cause enormous economic damage.
The budget is a key cog in the president’s aggressive climate agenda and his global warming crusade that his administration To labeled a crisis” several times since he took office. Days after his presidency, Biden denied the Keystone XL pipeline license, opened the door for radical regulation of fossil fuel producers and banned new leasing of oil and gas on federal lands, but every action by the executive has met a fierce response from the states.
Since then, the president has not just denounced fossil fuels, but has instead actively promoted renewable energy technology. Its administration noted On Wednesday, he would build seven wind farms nationwide that would have the capacity to provide enough energy to power 10 million homes by 2030.
“These technologies are not science fiction,” Biden remark after a September 14 visit to a National Renewable Energy Laboratory facility in Colorado. “They are ready to be installed across the country now. “
The Build Back Better Act would further implement a tax credit for wind, solar and geothermal power generation, according to Ebell. The bill also provides for an investment tax credit that would benefit developers of energy storage devices.
Among the climate policies contained in the Build Back Better Act is perhaps the $ 150 billion Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP). The program, which is the centerpiece of the bill’s climate agenda, would incent energy companies to produce lower emissions through a series of subsidies and fees.
“The CEPP is a repackaged version of a number of green energy proposals that have been made both recently and over the years for – we used to say a push – now that’s a lot. plus a strong push towards utilities generating at least 85% clean energy, ”Ryan Yonk, senior professor at the American Institute for Economic Research, told DCNF.
If an energy supplier increases its own production by 4% compared to the previous year, it would be eligible for a significant subsidy under the CEPP, according to to the Energy and Trade Committee. Companies that do not increase clean energy by this amount will be punished with a heavy fine payable to the Department of Energy.
The program requires companies to use subsidies to make energy more affordable for consumers. It also prohibits them from passing on program costs to consumers, but does not specify how this would ensure that price increases are not linked to CEPP fines.
The CEPP, however, continues to face opposition from West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin, who could be the decisive vote for the budget, Politico reported. Manchin would like to delete much of the program and include a broader definition of “clean energy”.
However, when asked in September if he would sign a budget bill with less climate provisions, Biden noted he was “for more climate measures”.
“It’s not based on science. It is not based on a comprehensive strategic plan. It does a lot of good, ”Utah Republican Representative John Curtis, a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee and chair of the Conservative Climate Caucus, told DCNF when asked. questions about the budget. “What are we trying to accomplish? What is the point ? Nobody said it.
He noted, for example, that the United States is well below the capacity of the network to handle the number of electric vehicle charging stations that the budget would fund. The budget did not receive the support of a single Republican elected official, not even Curtis, who supported many climate policies.
The bill also fails to recognize the shortcomings of such a rapid transition to renewables, Yonk said. Many projects, such as wind and solar, are still not profitable decades after investment started pouring into renewables.
In 2020, only 12% of the energy consumed by Americans came from renewable energies, according to at the Energy Information Administration (EIA). Solar and wind energy, which account for a large part of the renewable energy produced, are dependent on nature and can be unreliable.
While producers often tout the energy capacity of solar and wind, on average they produce less than half of that capacity, EIA data shows. show. A rapid shift to renewables in Europe has been a catalyst in the current energy crisis which has seen oil, gas and coal prices skyrocket, The Wall Street Journal reported.
Renewable energies require large battery storage facilities to overcome some of the problems posed by their intermittent nature, but the United States has a total storage capacity of almost 2 gigawatts, according to to an EIA report in August. By comparison, the United States consumes about 3.8 million gigawatts per hour last year.
“We really don’t know what an energy market might look like because we subsidize and regulate all the different parts of it,” Yonk told DCNF. “We took what could be determined by individuals making their own choices and replaced it with a political solution where the values of those lobbying – whether on the green side or on the production side of energy – are what actually determine where we get things from.
“As a result, we get things like the production tax credit or the investment tax credit that says, ‘Okay, if you do that shortlist of things, we’ll provide a subsidy.’ , he continued.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available free of charge to any eligible news editor who can offer a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected] Read the full story on the Daily Caller News Foundation